41:23 - Views
- 16K
- Likes
- 1.0K
- Comments
- 192
- Duration
- 41:23
- Quotes extracted
- 11
Quote map · 14 timestamped
Where each quote falls in the runtime. Click a marker to open YouTube at that moment.
Themes covered · 1
Top-level themes touched by quotes in this video, ranked by how many findings reference each.
Findings · 11
Hypotheses extracted from the transcript, ranked by analyst confidence.
- 01
Democrats failed to prevent or detect algorithmic vote manipulation in voting machines, which allegedly changed and deleted votes for their candidates after a certain threshold was met, particularly during in-person early voting.
-
"what I'm saying this means and what we need to validate and what paper ballots and an audit will show or not show is is there an algorithm that has a threshold of about 200 300 votes occurring in Clark County and potentially other places and we have data for that as well after that threshold it begins to change votes from one candidate to the other and then here's where we get into the math in order to keep one candidate at 60% if more votes were cast and you flipped enough you start deleting extra votes and so you're sitting at 60% you're deleting extra votes to keep that margin because if you kept flipping votes it would just keep going up until you hit 100 so you you keep keep it at 60."
16:47 Watch ↗ -
"if all else fails and you don't trust the statistics you don't trust the math we mapped early voting locations in Las Vegas in Clark County and so when you actually go and look at the registered um parties in this area this Las Vegas is blue it's absolutely blue it's ridiculously blue … we're seeing in these early voting locations where more votes were cast the Republican parties actually start to exceed the amount of democrat votes cast there … it would correlate the concept of if you had a vote changing algorithm that starts taking and deleting votes after a certain threshold it doesn't care about the demographics of the people there it just cares about changing votes."
23:40 Watch ↗ -
"what we're worried is a significant manipulation where votes change from the presidential race from one party to the other would cause a noticeable drop off anomaly across the state across multiple counties and so we're like all right if there was a vote changing algorithm and if it was just changing votes or deleting votes from the presidential race and maybe left the senate race alone in some places do we see drop off anomalies across multiple States"
26:24 Watch ↗
-
- 02
Democrats were made vulnerable by an alleged vote manipulation scheme that specifically targeted in-person voting methods, while leaving mail-in ballots—a key to their 2020 victory—largely untouched.
-
"if you're then looking at the potential manipulation the algorithm that is then shifting votes uh What uh Nathan essentially saying is and I'm just repeating repeating it just to underscore it is that the manipulation occurs with the the voting tabulation but not with the voting tabulation of mailin votes so the mailin votes that were dominant in 2020 and as Nathan just noted carried the state of Pennsylvania for Biden they weren't U messed with if you want to think of it that way …"
22:17 Watch ↗ -
"what's interesting is as I said we're only seeing significant manipulation in early voting here and then in 2020 we were seeing it in election day but we weren't really seeing it for mein and I find that very interesting with the amount of ma votes that were cast in the last election because of Co"
21:35 Watch ↗
-
- 03
The Democratic presidential candidate's anomalous underperformance compared to down-ballot Senate candidates in swing states indicates a systemic issue, likely manipulation, rather than a simple lack of voter enthusiasm.
-
"the Democratic presidential candidate on average across the seven swing States was netive 1.48% on the other hand the Republican candidate was positive 5.58% that means they got over 5% more votes on average than their Senate candidate of the same party what's strange is when we look at non- swing states and we average it out we see both of them sit closer to 1 to 2% positive so why is the Democratic presidential candidate underperforming in the swing States right that's conc to me that's this is the whole game to me this is the whole game."
27:33 Watch ↗
-
- 04
Democrats failed to detect or counter a 'vote-changing algorithm' that created unnaturally consistent voting patterns across entire states, a clear symptom of manipulation.
-
"when we look at 24 we argue this is a nonhuman consistency in voting pattern 2016 looks more human because those populations change and they don't all stay um in line that's the thing is drop off alone can't really show anything but if there was a vote changing algorithm then drop off would be a symptom if there was vote changes occurring and causing this nonhuman pattern."
29:40 Watch ↗
-
- 05
The Democratic Party is paralyzed and failing to challenge the election results because they fear the political 'stink' of being labeled election deniers, a fear that overrides the high stakes of ensuring election integrity.
-
"obviously we've got a Democratic party it seems that um is sitting on its hands through all of this partially I would say because it's kind of become a radioactive call to say I deny the result or I want to recount because of what happened in 2020 so the Democrats don't want to be considered that way they don't want that that kind of stink on them so they it makes no sense to me I mean it's much too big the stakes are far too great but that's where we are."
39:47 Watch ↗
-
- 06
Democrats did not adequately address or challenge a statistically improbable election outcome where 88 counties flipped to Republican and zero flipped to Democrat, a result that defies historical precedent even in landslide elections.
-
"88 counties changed from Blue to Red this election zero counties changed from red to blue this election that is um that is improbable realistically um even in other races where someone absolutely swept multiple States I think it was 1984 Ronald Reagan he won 49 out of 50 states and 30 counties were still flipped blue for his opposition party so for you to flip zero counties and only get I think what was the the total count somewhere around um 30 something States I'll have to to verify but you were nowhere close to winning at that level and yet zero counties flipped and you only got 49.8% of the popular vote you're under 50%"
34:34 Watch ↗
-
- 07
Democrats are failing to counter the false narrative that Kamala Harris's unpopularity caused the loss, when data shows she performed strongly and even exceeded Biden's 2020 numbers in key areas, suggesting the vote drop-off was caused by other factors.
-
"people are like hey drop off vote unpopularity for Harris right that's what we're talking about that's what the argument is is people didn't like candidate Harris they didn't vote for it well when you run the numbers she actually exceeded Biden's 2020 numbers in Wisconsin North Carolina and Georgia and got across the seven swing States 99 99.6% of the votes cast so this doesn't correlate with the amount of drop off we're seeing in some of these states uh it's very concerning"
36:11 Watch ↗
-
- 08
Democrats are failing to investigate the possibility that millions of votes were algorithmically changed, which, if reversed, would have resulted in a victory for their candidate in the swing states.
-
"we ran the numbers we gave a rough estimate we underestimated as much as we could uh it was still looking around 1.5 million potentially flipped votes in just six swing States and when we um invert those we find that Harris wins those six swing States if those votes were changed from one candidate to the other."
37:33 Watch ↗
-
- 09
Democrats are not fully accounting for the impact of voter suppression, particularly the suppression of mail-in ballots, which compounded the effects of alleged vote-flipping.
-
"this is not including voter suppression which Greg palast has highlighted and I agree 100% with him mailin voting was heavily suppressed I still have people telling me and sending me hey I went and checked my mail in and it never got counted it never got delivered here's another concern when we look at the way the algorithm potentially Works we're looking at votes being deleted as well"
37:56 Watch ↗
-
- 10
The Democratic party is failing to demand audits of compromised voting machine systems that are prevalent in swing states, thereby allowing the means for alleged election manipulation to persist into future elections.
-
"recounts aren't feasible because of our election law but we can have audits we can have audits in the swing States because if our machines are compromised the midterms won't be free and fair the next election there will be no we'll get them in the next time there will be no hey four years right our democracy requires that our voices are heard that's built into the Constitution that's the whole point and if our voices and our votes are not being counted we should be upset we should be looking into this this is a big deal."
38:50 Watch ↗
-
- 11
Democrats failed to ensure the integrity of the electoral process by not mandating comprehensive audits and verifiable paper trails for voting systems, leaving them vulnerable.
-
"so said we're we're pushing for audits we're we're pushing for for paper trail Audits and so you know if you can support us in that way that'd be awesome"
41:03 Watch ↗
-